By Tatjana
van der Krabben
I’ve been
holding off on writing this blog for a few years. I’m biased. I’m biased
because I’ve watched a close friend – as well as others – being reduced to
shadows of their former selves after gastric bypass surgery. So, at this point,
having watched them going through hell, knowing there is NO way back, because
it’s irreversible, there frankly are not enough successful cases in the world
to make me change my mind.
Lately I’ve
noticed quite a few lipedema patients are being referred for gastric surgery.
Also having serious, objective points of consideration on the subject, I feel I
need to come forward. So please excuse my lack of nuance this time around.
1. Referral is usually because of
suspected obesity
Lipedema is
not obesity. It’s not caused by overeating. The whole motivation behind the
referral stems from a false mindset. When bringing up their concerns and
questions regarding weight loss specific to lipedema limbs doctors a. turn out
to be oblivious about lipedema, b. don’t respond to patients who indicate they
eat little as it is. Eerily, when presented with this additional information,
the recommendation usually still stands. I’ve never heard of a doctor taking it
back.As for results: reduced leg size is reported, but it doesn’t take the lipedema away. That’s because calorie restriction doesn’t fix lipedema.
2. Gastric bypass surgery equals malnutrition
With the
stomach reduced to an unnaturally small size and the small intestine being
shortened, you will be unable to digest enough food to sustain yourself. I’m
talking nutrients here, not fuel to prevent you from burning fat. You will need
to supplement. That’s a given. Especially B12, calcium and iron are a problem.
3. But you already needed to
supplement?
You have
lipedema. B12 quite possibly already was a problem. And some. Even when
supplementing it can be challenging to keep symptoms of vitamin and mineral deficiency
at bay. Gastric bypass surgery will add to that challenge.
4. Do you need it?
Lipedema
can coincide with eating disorders and/or obesity. Fair enough. But the whole
procedure is created around the assumption you are overeating and unable to
restrict yourself to the point you can bring your weight down. But many of us
actually eat very little if not too little as it is. Suffer from undiagnosed
thyroid problems. As already indicated, lipedema is not caused by overeating.
If you don’t overeat, what is the point?
5. Surgery damages the lymphatic system
Every
surgery impacts the lymphatic system. Gastric bypass surgery is rather
invasive. In lipedema management damage to the lymphatic system is not exactly
welcomed. There’s no research on this issue. Most likely the surgeon involved
doesn’t know about lipedema. Then who will advise you properly on this
particular aspect?
6. Gastric surgery doesn’t fix
everything
Gastric surgery ensures reduced portions
food-wise. It doesn’t cure inflammation. Only the type of food you eat can help in that department. It doesn’t
prevent you from making poor diet choices; you could still eat pudding all day
long. It doesn’t fix an urge to soothe
yourself with food; whatever underlying issue has triggered that need, won’t go
away.
7. Is it ethical?
Is gastric
bypass surgery ethical? I wonder. Presumed healthy tissue from the small intestine
is removed. Now I’m this nature freak, true, but isn’t it odd to remove parts of a healthy organ? Also, the stomach is being
reduced to such a ridiculous small size, you can’t digest enough food to
provide yourself with enough nutrients. Especially with the reduced intestine,
which you need to absorb vitamins and minerals. You essentially get rewired for
malnutrition. And it’s irreversible. Frankly, I can’t wrap my head around this
package deal.
I’m not
getting into risk of complications and the mortality rate. Like I said: I’m
biased. Every surgery has its risks and statistics vary per conducted study and
clinic.
There are
other options. If you are willing to consider bariatric surgery, it doesn’t
have to be a gastric bypass. Gastric banding is far less invasive, less
connected to vitamin and mineral deficiency and reversible if need be.