Lipedema is poorly understood. That much we know. We gain, we hurt, we swell and deal
with inflammation. That we know, too. New research sometimes allows us to catch
a glimpse of what is or could be behind the veil. Best examples I know of at
this point is by Szél et al (2014) Pathophysiological dilemmas of lipedema (abstract) and by Bosman et al (pending) Prospective
controlled study to determine the use of ultrasound in lipoedema patients
compared to obesity, which reveals distinct characteristics in our connective
tissue.*
But these
glimpses are rare. Extremely rare. Most papers are still about liposuction or
what lipedema looks like, including overviews of traditional treatment options.
I know you can never get too sure about surgical intervention and within that
area of expertise much is being learned still, about treating stage 3 lipedema,
differences between types of cannulas and techniques etc. Most useful. Of
course.
But still… With
liposuction getting most attention and being presented in the media as a cure sometimes
or the only effective
treatment, a situation of supply and demand is being created, where patients
place their money – literally – on liposuction. It’s becoming the thing to do
and the thing to want. The next step, which is already becoming apparent, is
that treatment becomes about liposuction.
I would like to see
it as a tool in a toolbox that, like any toolbox, contains more useful tools
with room for more and new tools. New tools, less invasive hopefully, and, dare
I hope, even more effective, will not be found unless there’s a supply of data.
But before there’s supply, there needs to be demand. We need to voice that
demand. We need to be that demand. We
need to strive for more insight into causes of lipedema.
There’s still much
work to be done in raising awareness. Don’t give up on learning about the
cause(s) in this lifetime. Perhaps, as one of the members of Lipese Challenge
(Facebook group) suggested, it could be a plan to take matters in our own hands
and get new research topics on the table. Why not? Doctors tend to see those in
need of diagnosis and at that point barely informed. Once that hurdle is taken
and some additional reading and thinking is done, the vital questions start to
sink in. Questions we usually only express among ourselves.
I don’t mean to be
gloomy, but we are currently at risk to see research regarding causes being
skipped altogether in favor of treating symptoms. And nothing but symptoms. A course of action that happens to so many
conditions out there. Finding the needle in the haystack may not be
particularly marketable at the short term, but I for one would love to see it
found. Because, if you ask me, prevention for generations to come still trumps
surgery for damage control.
*Feel free to chime
in and point out recent groundbreaking research towards causes, which I may
have missed. Make my day!